Dollar Donation Club

// INTEGRATED IMPACT SCORE //

Organization

Plastic Fischer

Stopping ocean-bound plastic in rivers

🛡️ HighTrust Rating

🧐 LowRisk Rating

Flying Pig Logo
92%

Integrated Impact ScoreVetted By

Return On Donation

$1

2.2 lbsOf Ocean-bound Plastic Removed
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 16,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 26,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 36,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 46,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 56,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 16,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 26,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 36,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 46,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 56,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 16,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 26,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 36,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 46,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 56,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 16,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 26,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 36,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 46,820 in December
534,679 Lbs Removedturtle scroll icon 56,820 in December
Flying Pig Logo

Expert Consensus

An ultra cost-effective way to prevent plastic from entering the oceans, with an elegant and reliable technology.

Snapshot

The Problem

11 million tons of plastic waste enters the ocean every year, killing millions of animals annually. 80% of ocean plastic pollution comes from land-based sources, and rivers are the main way that plastic gets transported out to sea.

The Solution

"Trashbooms" are floating barriers that stop plastic waste in rivers before it reaches the ocean.

Impact to Date

  • Prevented over 412 Tons of plastic from entering the oceans (as of Dec 2022)

  • Designed the first open-source walkable river trash boom system

  • Expanded river “trashbooms” into multiple countries throughout Asia

Location of Impact

Asia

Impact Per $1

$1 = 2.2 lbs of ocean-bound plastic removed

Proof of Impact

  • Plastic removal is verified by a third party partner (Empower)

  • Monthly photo, video, and audio updates

Time to Realize Impact

< 3 months

Fund Usage

Will it actually make a difference?

Plastic Fischer is focused in a region that feeds plastic into one of the top 10 most polluting rivers in the world (Ganges River, India), and is employing a proven and measurable solution. 80% of ocean plastic pollution comes from land-based sources, and rivers are the main way that this plastic gets transported out to sea.

Each donation goes to the manufacturing and maintenance of river barrier systems that help develop waste management in local regions, and prevent ocean-bound plastic from reaching the ocean. In a word, yes!

How is the donation used?

Each dollar removes 1 kilogram or 2.2 lbs of ocean-bound plastic from highly polluting rivers (primarily in Asia) and ensures proper processing so that it never returns to the water or to landfills again.

DDC's Favorites

  • 3L approach: Locally sourced, low-tech & low-cost! This means more dollars going to removing plastic.

  • Plastic Fischer open-sources their river plastic solutions.

  • Rivers account for an estimated 80% of ocean plastic!

  • Plastic Fischer processes every kg of plastic removed to ensure it never returns to a river/the ocean ever again!

Key Drawbacks

  • Plastic Fischer is still a relatively young organization, working with a new technology that has not been proven over an extended period of time.

  • Although they are growing quickly, Plastic Fischer's scale is still relatively small compared to the scale of the problem. Their model is highly scalable, but it will take time to grow and clean more of the 1,800 rivers that transport the most ocean-bound plastic.

  • Plastic Fischer stems the flow of waste plastic to the oceans, but it alone won't stop the source of the plastic problem -- system-wide change is also needed (e.g. by governments and large corporations) to prevent production of single-use plastic in the first place.

  • We see an opportunity for Plastic Fischer to grow their partnerships and collaborations, to work with others who are cleaning plastic and advocating for change in the plastic problem.

Integrated Impact Score

Total Score92%

Effectiveness

85%

Per dollar, how effective is this organization at creating measurable impact?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely ineffective
Ineffective
Average effectiveness
Effective
Extremely effective

$1 removes 2.2 lbs of ocean-bound plastic. That is the equivalent of stopping 50 ocean-bound water bottles!

Is the organization's team credible and effective?

4
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely ineffective
Ineffective
Average effectiveness
Effective
Extremely effective

Plastic Fischer has a passionate, dedicated team of professionals with backgrounds in marine engineering, law and experienced field techs with local knowledge. Read their inspiring stories here.

While there is amazing promise with the team, Plastic Fischer is also a newer organization and has not yet been tested over the long term.

Does the organization have a clearly defined mission, vision and values?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Undefined
Unclearly defined
Relatively clearly defined
Clearly defined
Extremely clearly defined

“Our mission is to develop cost-efficient and effective low-tech solutions for any given river condition around the world.

Our vision is to clean rivers to save oceans.

We believe in collaboration, trustworthy partnerships and long-lasting impact through end-to-end solutions (pickup to disposal/recycling).”

How simple/elegant is the solution?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely complex
Complex
Simple
Very simple
Extremely simple

Plastic Fischer focuses on simplicity and efficiency by avoiding moving parts and using the power of the river whenever possible. The solutions have no frills, but get the job done. The 3L approach uses local, low-cost and low-tech solutions to tackle the problem quickly at scale and involve the local communities which is necessary for long term success.

Removing plastics up-stream is significantly easier and cheaper before it hits the ocean.

How scalable is the solution-set beyond its use-case geography?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely unscalable
Very unscalable
Relatively scalable
Very scalable
Extremely scalable

Their technology is built within local urban areas from off-the-shelf materials. By avoiding shipping parts from overseas they have high scalability, which ensures quick repair and no unnecessary carbon emissions.

These materials are easily accessible globally which allows this solution to scale along a majority of polluting rivers around the world.

How well does the solution create self-generating capabilities rather than rely on ongoing investment?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely reliant on ongoing investment
Very reliant on ongoing investment
Somewhat self-generating
Very self-generating
Extremely self-generating

A few recyclables are able to be sold in the local markets. Most of this is PET, glass or aluminum which averages around 3-5% of the ocean-bound waste. The main revenue stream is coming from “Plastic Fischer Credits.” Companies buy PFCs by paying Plastic Fischer per ton collected and processed to compensate for the plastic that they can't reduce within their supply chain.

Plastic Fischer barriers do require ongoing maintenance to remove and process the plastic, which is a condition currently present with all similar technologies.

How efficient is the process of achieving a self-sustaining solution?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely dependent
Very dependent
Fairly independent
Very independent
Extremely independent

The Plastic Fischer Credit (PFC) market is evolving at this time. The break-even point depends on the volumes of plastic that are being stopped. If enough companies pre-finance their expenses at a very polluted river, the site can become self-sustaining. Currently the system needs ongoing financing from companies and organizations to remove and process the plastic.

How much risk is there that the impact will be reversed for any reason?

4
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely risky
Very risky
Relatively risky
Very low risk
Extremely low risk

“Reversal” in this case could be defined as plastic being removed, only to end up in a river again, or a river barrier system breaking.

Plastics collected are verified and processed in the most safe manner possible so it will not end up back in the waterways. Plastic Fischer has partnered with Geocycle to create cement that is normally powered by coal-fired power plants, creating a solution that guarantees the plastic cannot physically re-enter waste streams.

With local knowledge of weather and by learning from complications of other boom systems during peak rain events, Plastic Fischer has designed emergency opening mechanisms that can release pressure created during heavy flow of rivers. They are able to open parts of the system itself, so that large volumes of water can pass and the equipment will not break and be washed away.

Transparency

80%

How transparent is the organization financially?

2
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely non-transparent
Very non-transparent
Somewhat transparent
Very transparent
Extremely transparent

Plastic Fischer has not disclosed public financial information, which is often standard practice for for-profit enterprises.

See Plastic Fischer's example budget and cost breakdown here.

How transparent is the organization operationally?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely non-transparent
Very non-transparent
Somewhat transparent
Very transparent
Extremely transparent

Plastic Fischer records and verifies all steps from collection to disposal with photos by working with Cleanhub, a platform for tracking and verifying waste collection of ocean bound plastics. Photos, videos and monthly updates of their progress are provided to all donors.

Plastic Fischer has also open-sourced all of their river barrier designs! You can find their designs on how to build a trash boom here.

Are regular updates on progress made readily available to donors?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Not at all
Very infrequently
Occasionally
Very frequently
Extremely frequently

Monthly data reports with the weight of collected plastic from each site (via CleanHub) and photos will be provided. There will also be videos, stories and interviews occasionally!

Track record

70%

How many years has the organization been in operation?

3
1
2
3
4
5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-10
10+

Plastic Fischer was founded in April 2019 and began operations in Indonesia in June 2019. They were operational until PF team had to leave the country due to COVID-19 in March 2020. Since January 2021, PF hired 32 full time employees and have deployed 14 systems in India and Indonesia (as of Feb 2022).

How much positive impact has the organization created in the past in it's category?

4
1
2
3
4
5
No past impact
Very little impact
Some positive impact
Significant impact
Extremely impactful

An estimated 100 tons of plastic have been stopped from entering the oceans from all current Plastic Fischer operations. The Trashboom in the Citarum River, Indonesia captures 1 ton of plastic per week.

How long has the solution-set been demonstrated to be effective?

2
1
2
3
4
5
< 1 year
1-3 years
3-7 years
7-10 years
> 10 years

The Citarum Trashboom has been in the water since September 2019 and does not show any signs of failure so far, and has been highly effective at its intended purpose.

The Varuna River trashboom in Varanasi India has been in the water since November, 2019 and has effectively helped capture over 11 tons of plastic in Varanasi at the time of first publishing this report (Feb 2022).

How clearly does the organization embody the values it purports to have?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely unclear
Very unclear
Somewhat clear
Very clearly
Extremely clearly

Plastic Fischer “key performance indicators” are 1) tons of plastic collected, 2) people employed full-time.

Plastic Fischer's goal is to protect marine habitats and biodiversity while motivating people to decrease the consumption of plastic products.

“We make sure that everyone we hire is joining the company with similar motivation. We hire similarly motivated people dedicated to honest impact with a primary focus for stopping plastic waste in rivers.”

Measurability

100%

Does the organization have a clearly defined "big goal" that is measurable?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Undefined
Unclearly defined
Relatively clearly defined
Clearly defined
Extremely clearly defined

The big goal is to clean the most polluted rivers and be one of the largest providers for plastic credits worldwide within the next three years. Plastic Fischer aims to collect and process thousands of tons from rivers around the world. This is measured, tracked and verified.

Initially Dollar Donation Club is partnering with Plastic Fischer to protect a section of the Ganges river in Varanasi, India. The goal is to deploy 12 solutions at tributary rivers to effectively protect the main river.

Does the organization have a clear understanding of the total projected cost to achieve the "big goal"?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Undefined
Unclearly defined
Relatively clearly defined
Clearly defined
Extremely clearly defined

The project costs are estimated to be $100,000, including at least 6 river systems, staff, a Material Recovery Facility (MRF), logistics and disposal/processing.

This will fund the operations for 12 months in Varanasi, and remove 100 tons of ocean-bound plastic.

Does the organization have a clear understanding of what $1 can accomplish?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Undefined
Unclearly defined
Relatively clearly defined
Clearly defined
Extremely clearly defined

$1 = 1kg plastic collected and processed (2.2 lbs).

Is the positive outcome quantifiable?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely unquantifiable
Very unquantifiable
Somewhat quantifiable
Very quantifiable
Extremely quantifiable

Yes, $100,000 = 100,000 kg of ocean-bound plastics collected, sorted, recycled or processed in the safest manner possible.

How well does the organization monitor and verify their ongoing progress?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely unquantifiable
Very unquantifiable
Somewhat quantifiable
Very quantifiable
Extremely quantifiable

Plastic Fischer collects data daily and measures the performance of each system to track the plastic that we stop from entering the oceans. Cleanhub is the verification partner, who collects 59 data points for every 1 ton of plastic removed--including weight, transportation data and even the subtraction of moisture content from removed plastics.

Wisdom

88%

Does the solution address a root cause, or a symptom?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely symptom focused
Very symptom focused
Relatively root focused
Very root focused
Extremely root focused

Plastic pollution is a symptom of poor design in packaging and poor waste management. Plastics are not designed for a circular economy and it is estimated that 70-80% of ocean plastics from the land, usually end up being washed into the ocean from rivers. (WData).

Plastic pollution has become such a ubiquitous problem that it has been deemed as dangerous as climate change (BBC).

Plastic Fischer is not solving the root of the plastic pollution problem, but they are solving close to the root by focusing on rivers–which have been identified as a major contributor of ocean plastic.

Does the solution have an economic model that is self-sustaining?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Absolutely no self-sustaining model
Very little self-sustaining model
A relatively self-sustaining model
A very self-sustaining model
An extremely self-sustaining model

Currently, recycling and processing of plastics do not allow for a self-sustaining economic model.

The main revenue stream is coming from “Plastic Fischer Credits.” Companies contribute to the environment by paying Plastic Fischer per ton collected and processed to compensate for the plastic that they can't reduce within their supply chain.

This is self-sustaining when companies are engaged in purchasing plastic credits.

To what degree does the solution prevent other potentially beneficial solutions from emerging?

5
1
2
3
4
5
To an extremely high degree
To a very high degree
To some degree
To a relatively low degree
To an extremely low degree

Plastic Fischer systems are modular, easy to deploy and retrieve. They build them with the idea that they can be improved or re-deployed elsewhere at any time.

River barriers are not permanent installments, so if better solutions emerge over time, the barriers can be decommissioned.

Does the solution integrate into local populations as part of the solution?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Not at all
Very little
Somewhat
Very much
Highly integrated

Plastic Fischer uses the 3L Approach:

Local: Manufacture and operate locally.

Low Tech: Simple, efficient design with no heavy engineering.

Low Cost: Local and low-tech lead to low-cost.

They create everything and operate locally. Plastic Fischer hires local engineers and pickup/sorting staff. They believe that working closely with the community is crucial to creating a lasting impact.

Does this solution produce any negative impact on indigenous populations?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely
Very much
Somewhat
Very little
Not at all

Our vetting has uncovered no negative influences on indigenous populations.

Does the solution consider its impact at least 7-generations into the future (>100 years)?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Not at all
Very little
Somewhat
Very much
Highly integrated

Plastic Fischer's river barriers are designed in such a way that they can be packed up and redeployed to new regions if a river is no longer polluting (that's the goal!).

The river barriers are also made from common materials that themselves can be recycled or repurposed in the future if needed.

What is the risk of unintended negative consequences?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely likely
Very likely
Somewhat likely
Very unlikely
Extremely unlikely

So far during their operations, the only unintended negative consequences have been related to regular maintenance and how systems deal with flooding/heavy rainfall.

Plastic Fischer builds the systems to withstand heavy river flow and if there is a break, each boom is attached in a way that it can be recovered and repaired, reducing the possibility of losing parts of the boom into the environment. During the heaviest rains/flooding, the booms are removed from the river for safety.

In the worst case event that massive flooding destroys the system and it is lost, Dollar Donation Club still maintains that the net positive benefit of many months of preventing ocean-bound plastic from reaching the ocean is a net-positive impact.

How significant are the known negative consequences (or trade-offs) of this solution?

4
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely significant
Very significant
Somewhat significant
Not very significant
Not at all significant

One trade-off that Plastic Fischer has made has been to opt for manual collection of waste rather than automated collection with machinery.  It’s often difficult to access the waterways that Plastic Fischer works in; in these settings, manual collection (using appropriate tools and safety equipment) is more efficient than automated collection, and is necessary to stop the plastic in waterways to prevent it from reaching larger water bodies (where recovering it is almost impossible).

To ensure staff safety, Plastic Fischer trains their operational staff to minimize their touch points with waste and to use appropriate tools for every type of site. On-site safety supervisors make sure that all risks are minimized before starting to collect waste.

Impact Innovation

95%

How audacious is the "big goal"?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Not at all
Very little
Somewhat
Very much
Extremely

Cleaning the most polluting rivers on the planet, removing plastics and processing them in the most environmentally responsible way possible is a big vision that is critical to the wellbeing of life on earth.

How difficult is this challenge to solve (weighing this against how many other organizations have found effective solutions)?

4
1
2
3
4
5
Not difficult at all
Not very difficult
Difficult
Very difficult
Extremely difficult

Despite rivers being identified as a major choke point for ocean plastic pollution, there have only been a handful of successful river barrier systems to date, due to a number of challenges inherent to the problem.

The flow of water in rivers--especially during peak rain events--can create challenging conditions for recovering plastics with barriers. Marine traffic, fish migrations and equipment wear and tear in water environments, create challenging conditions.

How much has the organization demonstrated an ability to innovate around novel problems?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely non-innovative
Very non-innovative
Somewhat innovative
Very innovative
Extremely innovative

Plastic Fischer has become a major leader in river plastic removal initiatives. In our vetting, we have identified many additional organizations who are using part or all of the Plastic Fischer open-source designs for their river barriers. Deploying a static structure into a moving river is not as easy as it may initially seem, and Plastic Fischer's system is proven to work.

Additionally, Plastic Fischer has developed 3 discrete river solutions that can address small tributaries and larger ones.

How urgent is this challenge to solve?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely distant
Relatively distant
Relatively urgent
Very urgent
Immediate threat

In a WWF paper on plastics and climate change they state,“In our oceans, which provide the largest natural carbon sink for greenhouse gases, plastic leaves a deadly legacy. It directly chokes and smothers a host of marine animals and habitats and can take hundreds of years to break down. As it does, sunlight and heat cause the plastic to release powerful greenhouse gases, leading to an alarming feedback loop. As our climate changes, the planet gets hotter, the plastic breaks down into more methane and ethylene, increasing the rate of climate change, and so perpetuating the cycle” (WWF).

Impact Stack

5.7

SDG01

Oceans and aquaculture provide employment for nearly 60 million people, provide a key source of protein for nearly 3 billion people and contribute 1.5 trillion dollars to the global economy, yearly. (WWF).

Communities globally are dependent on healthy oceans for their livelihoods. Plastic clean-ups are a crucial part of global economic security. Plastic Fischer's work directly prevents ocean-bound plastic, protecting the ocean and humanity's ability to generate economic stability from the ocean.

Furthermore, Plastic Fischer employs only local individuals to build, maintain and repair the river barriers, and hires local waste pickers to remove and process the plastic.

SDG02

Approximately 3 billion people in the world rely on seafood as a primary source of protein. Marine plastics are adversely affecting the marine life that humans depend on for sustenance. Without healthy fisheries and ecosystems, there is an increase in disease, poverty, starvation and displaced peoples. (WWF)

Plastic Fischer's prevention of high volumes of ocean-bound plastic directly mitigates the negative effects of plastic on global aquaculture.

SDG03

By collecting plastic from the rivers and ensuring safe processing, Plastic Fischer ensures that less plastic ends up in the food chain or is burned openly, causing toxic emissions.

SDG06

Plastic Fischer decreases the pollution in rivers before it ends up in the ocean. Specifically by focusing on rivers, Plastic Fischer is focusing on a major choke point in the global plastic pollution crisis. Plastics collected are recycled or used to create energy, ensuring that this is not entering landfills which can leach into groundwater creating a toxic environment.

SDG07

Plastic Fischer has partnered with Geocycle to create cement that is normally powered by coal-fired power plants, creating a solution that guarantees the plastic cannot physically re-enter waste streams. Plastic -- being a fossil fuel that has already been extracted from the environment -- can be used for energy production, which prevents additional resource extraction and leads to a net carbon offset.

SDG08

Plastic Fischer employs only local individuals to build, maintain and repair the river barriers, and hires local waste pickers to remove and process the plastic.

SDG09

Plastic Fischer's approach introduces basic waste management practices to regions that have little to no waste management. By working with local communities, their solutions help nurture local regions to take on long term approaches to waste management, solving the problem beyond their intervention.

SDG11

River barriers help prevent the proliferation of plastic waste into more dispersed environments (rivers, oceans), and help nurture local waste management infrastructure.

SDG12

Plastic Fischer's projects raise awareness about the effect of single-use plastics on global ecosystems, and encourage better waste management practices in the regions that they work in.

SDG13

Healthy and well-functioning rivers and oceans are critical to climate and atmospheric regulation. The removal of plastics assists the restoration of the ocean and its functions, which is an integral part of climate stability. See additional resources linked below:

Yale: plastics & climate change paper

Marine Plastics & Climate

Plastics and Climate Change

SDG14

Plastic Fischer deploys systems that are careful to allow safe passage of wildlife. By collecting dangerous waste, they stop ocean-bound plastic before it reaches the ocean. Furthermore, they prevent the creation of future microplastics which is a great cause of harm not only to marine and aquatic life, but to mammals, birds and humans.

(“Not just sea life”)

SDG15

Plastic Fischer's trashbooms reduce the degradation of natural habitats, halting and reversing biodiversity loss and land degradation, allowing natural systems to regenerate, creating cascading positive benefits for life on land (River plastic pollution).

Expert Vetters

Tom Chi's photo

Tom Chi

Co-founder, Google X

"Rivers are a natural place to attack the ocean plastic problem. I appreciate their appropriate technology lens to how they are looking at the problem."

Scarlett Arana's photo

Scarlett Arana

United Nations SDG 14 Ambassador (Life Below Water)

"Excellent, scalable solution at low cost where plastic debris collection is lacking."

Christopher Verlinden, PhD's photo

Christopher Verlinden, PhD

U.S Coast Guard; CTO, Applied Ocean Sciences

"This is a no brainer. Simple, efficient and effective."

Brooke Darshana's photo

Brooke Darshana

Expedition Coordinator & Scientific Diver, J Craig Venter Institute

(Quote not yet available)

Chad Frischmann's photo

Chad Frischmann

Founder, Regenerative Intelligence; former Director, Project Drawdown

"Plastic Fischer’s approach is the type of win-win-win solution we need to effectively prevent a lot of plastic from entering the ocean in the first place."

Individual Questions

The Context

About Ocean Plastics 

We have a plastic pandemic.

Plastic makes life super convenient for humans, and super inconvenient for everyone else in the ecosystems of planet earth.

At least 8 million tons of plastic enters the oceans annually. Marine animals ingest or are entangled by plastics, which causes severe injuries and deaths. Over 650,000 marine animals are killed annually by entanglement.

The issue of Ocean Plastics can be looked at in 5 large categories:

1. Manufacturing & consumption (the root issue) 

2. River pollution (feeding into oceans)

3. Coastal pollution

4. Ocean Macroplastics (big stuff)

5. Ocean Microplastics (small stuff) 

6. Recycling & Reuse

Manufacturing & consumption

Humanity has generated over 8.3 billion tons of plastic over the last 6 decades, and it’s estimated that 91% of that isn’t recycled.  At the same time, it takes over 400 years for those plastics to break down. 

To get to the root of the issue, manufacturers, companies and consumers must confront the reality that a paradigm shift is needed at the root.

River pollution (feeding into oceans)

Rivers transport between 0.47 million to 2.75 million metric tons of plastic into the ocean every year.  80% of ocean plastic pollution comes from land-based sources, and rivers are the main way that this plastic gets transported out to sea. Less than 2,000 rivers are responsible for 80% of all the plastic that rivers release into the ocean. 

Coastal Pollution

A less significant portion of ocean plastics drift from waste sites toward coastlines and ultimately end up in the ocean.

Ocean Macroplastics

The big stuff in the ocean is primarily abandoned fishing gear (up to 70% of all surface plastics are fishing gear). These “Ghost Nets” roam the ocean killing over 650,000 marine animals annually, destroying reefs and transmitting diseases between reefs (source).

Ocean Microplastics

Mid-ocean microplastics are easily the most challenging and difficult aspect of this challenge to tackle. These are plastic particles less than 5mm in length, and include microfibers from clothing, microbeads and plastic pellets (source). Macroplastics (like Ghost Nets) also eventually break down into microplastics over time. 

Additional Data & References

About

We’re levelin’ up philanthropy!


The Dollar Donation Club Integrated Impact Score was designed to ensure that the world’s most powerful and holistic solutions are presented to our members. The goal is to identify acupuncture points of change – solutions that create maximum positive benefit using minimal resources, while triggering a large cascade of additional benefits.


More importantly, the Integrated Impact Score embodies our approach of smart-philanthropy.


It’s not enough for us to give with only our heart. We must also give intelligently – identifying solutions that address root causes, generate outsized measurable outcomes, integrate holistically into existing communities, consider long-term impacts, reduce the risk of unintended consequences and lead to self-reliant capabilities rather than co-dependencies.


It’s time for us to focus less on things like “overhead ratios” and more on the total, holistic positive result per dollar. Oh yeah, and it should be fun!


We believe that the best solutions...


  • Solve root-causes rather than symptoms.
  • Consider their impact 100 years into the future.
  • Produce massive impact efficiently.
  • Care for people and planet holistically.
  • Leverage nature’s and humanity’s best technologies.
  • Are radically transparent – financially and operationally.
  • Are resilient against threats of reversal.
  • Result in self-reliance, rather than dependence.
  • Clearly understand total costs to achieve outcomes.

This vetting methodology was designed with careful care to identify these solutions.



How we calculate the Integrated Impact Score:


Individual Dimension Score


The scores for each individual dimension (e.g. Transparency, Measurability) are calculated by adding up the total points (1-5) per section and dividing by the total possible points for that section.


Impact Stack


The amount of points awarded for the Impact Stack section is based on an assessment of how directly or indirectly and effectively or ineffectively the solution addresses a particular Sustainable Development Goal, using the SDG indicators as a guide. Impact Stack is treated like a bonus of points by adding up the total Impact Stack score and dividing by 10 (i.e. every 10 points gives a bonus of +1 to the final IIS score).


Overall Integrated Impact Score


The overall Integrated Impact Score is calculated by averaging the total scores received in each of the Individual Dimensions (e.g. Transparency, Measurability, etc.). We then add the bonus points awarded by the Impact Stack. Overall scores are rounded up to the nearest integer at 0.5 (e.g. if a score of 94.5 is calculated, the final score will be 95, if a score of 94.4 is calculated, the final score will be 94).

Vetting methodology 02.01 | Published 12.29.2022 | This report's change log is here.

footer bgnoise pattern

100% of contributions go to the Dollar Donation Club Fund, a wholly owned subsidiary of Legacy Global Foundation Inc, a public 501(c)3 charitable organization.

Š Dollar Donation Club 2024