Dollar Donation Club

// INTEGRATED IMPACT SCORE //

Organization

šŸ›”ļø Trust Rating

🧐 Risk Rating

Return On Donation

$1

7Seagrass Seeds Planted
Flying Pig Logo
60 %

Integrated Impact ScoreVetted By

275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
275,278 Seagrass Seeds Planted23,183 in April
Flying Pig Logo

Expert Consensus

Snapshot

The Problem

The Solution

Impact to Date

Location of Impact

Impact Per $1

Proof of Impact

Time to Realize Impact

Fund Usage

Will it actually make a difference?

How is the donation used?

DDC's Favorites

Key Drawbacks

Integrated Impact Score

Total Score60%

Effectiveness

60%

Per dollar, how effective is this organization at creating measurable impact?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely ineffective
Ineffective
Average effectiveness
Effective
Extremely effective

Is the organization's team credible and effective?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely ineffective
Ineffective
Average effectiveness
Effective
Extremely effective

Does the organization have a clearly defined mission, vision and values?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Undefined
Unclearly defined
Relatively clearly defined
Clearly defined
Extremely clearly defined

How simple/elegant is the solution?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely complex
Complex
Simple
Very simple
Extremely simple

How scalable is the solution-set beyond its use-case geography?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely unscalable
Very unscalable
Relatively scalable
Very scalable
Extremely scalable

How well does the solution create self-generating capabilities rather than rely on ongoing investment?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely reliant on ongoing investment
Very reliant on ongoing investment
Somewhat self-generating
Very self-generating
Extremely self-generating

How efficient is the process of achieving a self-sustaining solution?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely dependent
Very dependent
Fairly independent
Very independent
Extremely independent

How much risk is there that the impact will be reversed for any reason?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely risky
Very risky
Relatively risky
Very low risk
Extremely low risk

Transparency

60%

How transparent is the organization financially?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely non-transparent
Very non-transparent
Somewhat transparent
Very transparent
Extremely transparent

How transparent is the organization operationally?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely non-transparent
Very non-transparent
Somewhat transparent
Very transparent
Extremely transparent

Are regular updates on progress made readily available to donors?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Not at all
Very infrequently
Occasionally
Very frequently
Extremely frequently

Track record

60%

How many years has the organization been in operation?

3
1
2
3
4
5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-10
10+

How much positive impact has the organization created in the past in it's category?

3
1
2
3
4
5
No past impact
Very little impact
Some positive impact
Significant impact
Extremely impactful

How long has the solution-set been demonstrated to be effective?

3
1
2
3
4
5
< 1 year
1-3 years
3-7 years
7-10 years
> 10 years

How clearly does the organization embody the values it purports to have?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely unclear
Very unclear
Somewhat clear
Very clearly
Extremely clearly

Measurability

60%

Does the organization have a clearly defined "big goal" that is measurable?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Undefined
Unclearly defined
Relatively clearly defined
Clearly defined
Extremely clearly defined

Does the organization have a clear understanding of the total projected cost to achieve the "big goal"?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Undefined
Unclearly defined
Relatively clearly defined
Clearly defined
Extremely clearly defined

Does the organization have a clear understanding of what $1 can accomplish?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Undefined
Unclearly defined
Relatively clearly defined
Clearly defined
Extremely clearly defined

Is the positive outcome quantifiable?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely unquantifiable
Very unquantifiable
Somewhat quantifiable
Very quantifiable
Extremely quantifiable

How well does the organization monitor and verify their ongoing progress?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely unquantifiable
Very unquantifiable
Somewhat quantifiable
Very quantifiable
Extremely quantifiable

Wisdom

60%

Does the solution address a root cause, or a symptom?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely symptom focused
Very symptom focused
Relatively root focused
Very root focused
Extremely root focused

Does the solution have an economic model that is self-sustaining?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Absolutely no self-sustaining model
Very little self-sustaining model
A relatively self-sustaining model
A very self-sustaining model
An extremely self-sustaining model

To what degree does the solution prevent other potentially beneficial solutions from emerging?

3
1
2
3
4
5
To an extremely high degree
To a very high degree
To some degree
To a relatively low degree
To an extremely low degree

Does the solution integrate into local populations as part of the solution?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Not at all
Very little
Somewhat
Very much
Highly integrated

Does this solution produce any negative impact on indigenous populations?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely
Very much
Somewhat
Very little
Not at all

Does the solution consider its impact at least 7-generations into the future (>100 years)?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Not at all
Very little
Somewhat
Very much
Highly integrated

What is the risk of unintended negative consequences?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely likely
Very likely
Somewhat likely
Very unlikely
Extremely unlikely

How significant are the known negative consequences (or trade-offs) of this solution?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely significant
Very significant
Somewhat significant
Not very significant
Not at all significant

Impact Innovation

60%

How audacious is the "big goal"?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Not at all
Very little
Somewhat
Very much
Extremely

How difficult is this challenge to solve (weighing this against how many other organizations have found effective solutions)?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Not difficult at all
Not very difficult
Difficult
Very difficult
Extremely difficult

How much has the organization demonstrated an ability to innovate around novel problems?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely non-innovative
Very non-innovative
Somewhat innovative
Very innovative
Extremely innovative

How urgent is this challenge to solve?

3
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely distant
Relatively distant
Relatively urgent
Very urgent
Immediate threat

Impact Stack

0

Expert Vetters

Individual Questions

The Context

About

We’re levelin’ up philanthropy!


The Dollar Donation Club Integrated Impact Score was designed to ensure that the world’s most powerful and holistic solutions are presented to our members. The goal is to identify acupuncture points of change – solutions that create maximum positive benefit using minimal resources, while triggering a large cascade of additional benefits.


More importantly, the Integrated Impact Score embodies our approach of smart-philanthropy.


It’s not enough for us to give with only our heart. We must also give intelligently – identifying solutions that address root causes, generate outsized measurable outcomes, integrate holistically into existing communities, consider long-term impacts, reduce the risk of unintended consequences and lead to self-reliant capabilities rather than co-dependencies.


It’s time for us to focus less on things like ā€œoverhead ratiosā€ and more on the total, holistic positive result per dollar. Oh yeah, and it should be fun!


We believe that the best solutions...


  • Solve root-causes rather than symptoms.
  • Consider their impact 100 years into the future.
  • Produce massive impact efficiently.
  • Care for people and planet holistically.
  • Leverage nature’s and humanity’s best technologies.
  • Are radically transparent – financially and operationally.
  • Are resilient against threats of reversal.
  • Result in self-reliance, rather than dependence.
  • Clearly understand total costs to achieve outcomes.

This vetting methodology was designed with careful care to identify these solutions.



How we calculate the Integrated Impact Score:


Individual Dimension Score


The scores for each individual dimension (e.g. Transparency, Measurability) are calculated by adding up the total points (1-5) per section and dividing by the total possible points for that section.


Impact Stack


The amount of points awarded for the Impact Stack section is based on an assessment of how directly or indirectly and effectively or ineffectively the solution addresses a particular Sustainable Development Goal, using the SDG indicators as a guide. Impact Stack is treated like a bonus of points by adding up the total Impact Stack score and dividing by 10 (i.e. every 10 points gives a bonus of +1 to the final IIS score).


Overall Integrated Impact Score


The overall Integrated Impact Score is calculated by averaging the total scores received in each of the Individual Dimensions (e.g. Transparency, Measurability, etc.). We then add the bonus points awarded by the Impact Stack. Overall scores are rounded up to the nearest integer at 0.5 (e.g. if a score of 94.5 is calculated, the final score will be 95, if a score of 94.4 is calculated, the final score will be 94).

footer bgnoise pattern

100% of contributions go to the Dollar Donation Club Fund, a wholly owned subsidiary of Legacy Global Foundation Inc, a public 501(c)3 charitable organization.

Ā© Dollar Donation Club 2026