Dollar Donation Club

// INTEGRATED IMPACT SCORE //

Organization

Trees for the Future

Trees that end hunger and poverty

🛡️ HighTrust Rating

🧐 LowRisk Rating

Flying Pig Logo
100%

Integrated Impact ScoreVetted By

Return On Donation

$1

2.86Trees Planted
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 11,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 21,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 31,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 41,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 51,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 11,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 21,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 31,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 41,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 51,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 11,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 21,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 31,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 41,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 51,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 11,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 21,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 31,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 41,565 in November
992,534 Trees Plantedturtle scroll icon 51,565 in November
Flying Pig Logo

Expert Consensus

A solution that helps people, the land, and the climate at the same time: Forest Gardens help people living in extreme poverty to feed their families and grow a better future for themselves and their communities. 

Snapshot

The Problem

In Sub-Saharan Africa, 422 million people still live in poverty. Many of these are farmers who tend small plots of land; they often struggle to make ends meet and feed their families.  

The Solution

Forest Gardens help mono-crop farmers transition to agroforestry, a method of farming that restores nutrients in the soil, plants trees that sequester carbon, and provides communities with year-round access to highly nutritious organic food. 

Impact to Date

  • Over 190 Million trees planted since 1989

  • Over 28,000 acres of land revitalized (this is about 21,000 football fields!)

  • Over $59 million raised to date.

  • Over 100,000 farmers uplifted from hunger & poverty

Location of Impact

“Cameroon, Kenya, Senegal, Uganda, and Tanzania, as these are areas where we are having the biggest impact and seeing profound results.”

Impact Per $1

$1 =

  • 2.8 trees planted

  • 11.2 lbs. CO2 removed/yr

  • 10.5 lbs. organic produce

  • 44.49 sq ft. land restored

Proof of Impact

Updates from training and planting; stories of the people who are impacted directly by your donation.

Time to Realize Impact

Up to 1 year until first trees are planted (since farmers need to be trained); 5 years until results are fully realized (Forest Garden is sequestering CO2 and producing fruit).

Fund Usage


Detailed breakdown here.

Will it actually make a difference?

Forest Gardens empower farmers to uplift themselves from hunger and poverty, while also transforming barren or monocropped farmland into bio-diverse, living gardens. On average, farmers increase their income by 400% while regenerating our planet!

In short: Yup. A big one!

How is the donation used?

Your $1 helps fund 4 years of training, the seeds, tools and materials for farmers to establish their own Forest Garden. At year 4, the trees are flourishing and farmers are in a groove!

DDC's Favorites

  • The Forest Garden model empowers farmers to uplift themselves while regenerating the land.

  • Creates a micro-local food supply that is resilient against corruption.

  • Global leader in trees-grown per dollar

  • Highly integrated -- 10 Sustainable Development Goals in one solution!

Key Drawbacks

  • Trees for the Future only operates in Sub-Saharan Africa, and hasn’t scaled to other parts of the world yet (in 2014, they made a decision to streamline their approach and focus on Africa). 

  • At this time, they can only share project-specific updates quarterly, not monthly. 

  • It takes 5 years to fully realize the impact of the donation (the training, planting, and growing take time).

     

  • There’s space to improve their long-term verification of tree growth and maturity.  While they do closely follow farmers for the first four years, after those 4 years TFTF do random sampling but not rigorous long-term follow up for all trees and gardens. 

Integrated Impact Score

Total Score100%

Effectiveness

93%

Per dollar, how effective is this organization at creating measurable impact?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely ineffective
Ineffective
Average effectiveness
Effective
Extremely effective

(See “$1 = in Overview section)

Additional benefits:

- 400% increase in income (on average) for farmers (Data Sheet Tab 4)

- Significantly improved nutrition (Data Sheet Tab 3)

- Enables a micro-local food supply chain

- Soil regeneration

- Increased biodiversity

- Resilience against flooding

- Resilience against crop failure

- Restoration of local watersheds

Is the organization's team credible and effective?

4
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely ineffective
Ineffective
Average effectiveness
Effective
Extremely effective

The DDC team has been extremely impressed by the leadership team's ability to achieve remarkable results while remaining lean and efficient.

TFTF have demonstrated exceptional credibility backed by policies that support transparency with clear delineation of roles. The team bios and information can be found here https://trees.org/team/

Does the organization have a clearly defined mission, vision and values?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Undefined
Unclearly defined
Relatively clearly defined
Clearly defined
Extremely clearly defined

See their "About Us" page for Mission and Vision. See Values here (page 5).

More information on their approach can be found here.

How simple/elegant is the solution?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely complex
Complex
Simple
Very simple
Extremely simple

The Forest Garden Approach (FGA) leverages nature's processes (through principles of Permaculture) to maximize impact with minimal resources. The solution meets the needs of those who benefit from the program, while providing a clear and direct path to persistent and self-generating positive outcomes. See more details of the solution here https://trees.org/approach/

How scalable is the solution-set beyond its use-case geography?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely unscalable
Very unscalable
Relatively scalable
Very scalable
Extremely scalable

The Forest Garden approach is a generally universal solution-set that could provide equally positive results in many other regions struggling with hunger, poverty and ecological degradation. The total potential of this solution-set at a large scale is significant, though it is likely that the cost to achieve similar results will vary on different continents. There are very few if any elements of the FGA that could not be applied elsewhere.

TFTF is building capacities to scale training further through training videos.

How well does the solution create self-generating capabilities rather than rely on ongoing investment?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely reliant on ongoing investment
Very reliant on ongoing investment
Somewhat self-generating
Very self-generating
Extremely self-generating

The FGA results in a natural resource for farmers that will continually generate economic and agricultural returns that do not require additional external investment to maintain. After the initial 4 years of time and financial investment in farmer education, Forest Gardens are able to continue generating benefits deep into the future. Furthermore, forest gardens continue to provide ecological benefits year after year (soil enrichment, air quality, regenerates watershed, increased biodiversity, flooding resiliency).

(To see Data Sheet Tab 4 click here)

How efficient is the process of achieving a self-sustaining solution?

4
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely dependent
Very dependent
Fairly independent
Very independent
Extremely independent

While the Forest Garden approach is an extremely self-sustaining model, there may be more efficient training approaches that would reduce the amount of time necessary to educate farmers to the point of self-sufficiency. Currently it takes 4 years to establish total self-sufficiency

How much risk is there that the impact will be reversed for any reason?

4
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely risky
Very risky
Relatively risky
Very low risk
Extremely low risk

The Forest Garden is a uniquely resilient solution for a variety of reasons--most notably the FGA enables farmers their own sovereign source of food and all the tools necessary to increase income by 400% on average--all embedded into their backyard. The decentralized, micro-local food supply chain is uniquely resilient to the potential for politically motivated disruption of food supply. The FGA itself provides ecological resilience to climate change and flooding. It is a more antifragile approach than monocropping, which is at risk of total crop failure and may only be harvested once/annually compared to harvests throughout the year. Forest Gardens satisfy so many dimensions of need (economic, nutritional, ecological) that farmers choosing to reverse their own progress through short-term gains (selling land, clear-cutting, etc) is low.

Transparency

100%

How transparent is the organization financially?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely non-transparent
Very non-transparent
Somewhat transparent
Very transparent
Extremely transparent

TFTF publishes their financial reports annually for anyone to review. You can read their financials, IRS audit reports and financial reports here: https://trees.org/financial-information/.

TFTF was rated 100% in “Accountability & Transparency” by Charity Navigator: Click here

TFTF also received GuideStar's Platinum Seal of Transparency: Click here

How transparent is the organization operationally?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely non-transparent
Very non-transparent
Somewhat transparent
Very transparent
Extremely transparent

Trees.org exhibits clear and accessible information about ongoing activities and internal initiatives.

Current operations and execution plans can be seen in detail in their impact report.

Their education programs and execution plans can also be found here.

Are regular updates on progress made readily available to donors?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Not at all
Very infrequently
Occasionally
Very frequently
Extremely frequently

TFTF posts photos and/or educational materials and clips daily or weekly on Instagram and Facebook related to real farmers.

Extensive impact reports and monitoring are available on their website trees.org

Track record

95%

How many years has the organization been in operation?

5
1
2
3
4
5
0-1
1-3
3-5
5-10
10+

Trees for the Future was established in 1989.

(They're basically an Ent!)

How much positive impact has the organization created in the past in it's category?

5
1
2
3
4
5
No past impact
Very little impact
Some positive impact
Significant impact
Extremely impactful

As of the date of this vetting (September, 2020) TFTF has planted 190,000,000 trees, restored 28,279 acres of land and directly impacted 111,727 people whose lives have been transformed thanks to the Forest Garden approach (and more are being planted all the time!).

How long has the solution-set been demonstrated to be effective?

4
1
2
3
4
5
< 1 year
1-3 years
3-7 years
7-10 years
> 10 years

TFTF was incorporated as a tree planting public charity in 1989 and the focus on Forest garden systems specifically began in 2015, but had been in development for years prior.

How clearly does the organization embody the values it purports to have?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely unclear
Very unclear
Somewhat clear
Very clearly
Extremely clearly

DDC highlights these embodied values apparent from our vetting:

1) Accessibility, demonstrated by solutions that are designed to make the approach accessible to everyone--especially those in extreme poverty.

2) Diversity, where the Forest Garden solution is extremely diversified--ecologically, economically and for and through the people it serves.

3) Entrepreneurialism, through the application of strong organizational and business principles in their approach to tackling hunger, poverty and ecological restoration (evident in strategy, operations, leadership and their learning-based approach).

4) Results, embodied by TFTF's remarkable ability to create precise and measurable impact over time with a strong focus on data collection and optimization.

Click here to see all values on Page 8 of their 2019 Impact Report.

Measurability

100%

Does the organization have a clearly defined "big goal" that is measurable?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Undefined
Unclearly defined
Relatively clearly defined
Clearly defined
Extremely clearly defined

“Bring 2 million rural farmers out of poverty by planting 1,000,000 forest gardens (effectively planting 1 billion trees in the process).”

Does the organization have a clear understanding of the total projected cost to achieve the "big goal"?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Undefined
Unclearly defined
Relatively clearly defined
Clearly defined
Extremely clearly defined

Trees for the Future has a plan to scale to 1,000,000 Forest Gardens by 2030, planting 1 billion trees. The total projected budget for this plan is $250,000,000.

Since 1989, Trees for the Future has refined their process to reduce costs and ensure as much goes to the farmers and trees as possible. They have been able to reliably plant trees for as little as $0.10 per tree. As they scale to a larger goal, $0.25 per tree accounts for total costs. The plan is well founded on past credibility and proof-cases. This, paired with TFTF's strong focus on transparency give us strong confidence in the financials behind this plan.

Does the organization have a clear understanding of what $1 can accomplish?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Undefined
Unclearly defined
Relatively clearly defined
Clearly defined
Extremely clearly defined

$1 =

- 4 trees planted

- 16 lbs of CO2 removed/ year

- 63.56 sq ft of land restored

- 15 lbs of organic fruits & vegetables harvested

These results are fully realized after 5 years.

(To see Data Sheet Tab 1 click here)

Is the positive outcome quantifiable?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely unquantifiable
Very unquantifiable
Somewhat quantifiable
Very quantifiable
Extremely quantifiable

Achieving the big goal would additional result in the following benefits:

- Eradicates hunger for 2 million people, continuously.

- 320,000 acres converted from monocropped or desertified farmland to sustainable forest gardens with farmers (2,500 trees/acre).

- 1 Forest Garden produces 7.7 tons of organic produce within 4 years.

- 46.28 million tons of CO2 sequestered over 20 years through forest gardens.

1 Forest Garden results in:

- 3,200 Trees planted.

- Increases income of farmers by 400% on average (continously).

- 1-2 acres regenerated land (majority are 1 acre).

- An additional 800 trees planted in the surrounding area on community or preservation land.

- A minimum of 12 marketable crop types.

Proper monitoring of the physical, biological, and chemical changes on a farmer's land (and of the farming family's health) throughout the program provides a high level of certainty that the Forest Garden Approach works. TFTF utilizes soil testing, carbon sequestration calculations, nutrition, aerial/ remote monitoring and NASA LIDAR scans. Learn more about their “Quantifying Integrated Impact” here.

All of these data represent a quantifiable expression of TFTF's focus on “ending hunger, ending poverty, ending deforestation.”

(To see Data Sheet Tab 1 click here)

How well does the organization monitor and verify their ongoing progress?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely unquantifiable
Very unquantifiable
Somewhat quantifiable
Very quantifiable
Extremely quantifiable

TREES currently uses GIS and drone evaluation to collect robust data sets for 100% of Forest Gardens within the 4 year training. Beyond 4 years, TFTF randomly samples 10% of their Forest Gardens to assess overall progress on key metrics.

Technical Data Form (TDF):

This survey is conducted for 100% of Forest Gardens each year. It records GPS locations, physicalities of land (e.g. size), production (e.g. marketable products, number of trees onsite before and during, estimated tree cover percentage), and household socioeconomic data (e.g. family size, baseline income).

Sample Survey:

A sample size is selected for a 95% (+/-5%) confidence level.

Using ArcGIS and GPS points, families are randomly selected from each project for an in-depth survey, which covers four main areas:

- General demographics: family size, age, education levels, gender

- FAO Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS)

- FAO Household Food Insecurity Access Scale Survey

- Household resilience related to increase in income year-on-year during project

Annual Evaluation:

This tracks the sustainable land use practices farmers are using including: mulching, composting, Integrated pest management, live fencing, alley cropping, perma gardening, etc. This assists in increasing the CO2 offset numbers.

Wisdom

98%

Does the solution address a root cause, or a symptom?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely symptom focused
Very symptom focused
Relatively root focused
Very root focused
Extremely root focused

The Forest Garden approach addresses symptoms of hunger and poverty and base-level sustenance needs through root causes of ecological degradation. It's clear that the longevity and durability of the FGA leads to a sustained and fundamental solution.

Does the solution have an economic model that is self-sustaining?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Absolutely no self-sustaining model
Very little self-sustaining model
A relatively self-sustaining model
A very self-sustaining model
An extremely self-sustaining model

A forest garden provides farmers with a source of income while reducing costs of living (food), creating a highly sustainable economic model that increases it's value year after year.

(To see Data Sheet Tab 4 regarding projected income for farmers click here.

To what degree does the solution prevent other potentially beneficial solutions from emerging?

5
1
2
3
4
5
To an extremely high degree
To a very high degree
To some degree
To a relatively low degree
To an extremely low degree

Forest Gardens convert desert-like or monocropped land into verdant ecosystems, while regenerating the soil to be rich, healthy and organic.

This process transforms low-value land resources into high-value land resources naturally, with self-generating properties that increase in value with each year.

This doesn't prevent others uses for the land but dramatically increases the opportunities for what that land can do for local communities and wildlife.

Click here to see planting methodology

Click here to the Tree Species list

Does the solution integrate into local populations as part of the solution?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Not at all
Very little
Somewhat
Very much
Highly integrated

Forest Gardens weave seamlessly into the local agricultural economy and lifestyle, and are specifically focused on providing tools and training that integrate into the pre-existing agricultural norms.

Does this solution produce any negative impact on indigenous populations?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely
Very much
Somewhat
Very little
Not at all

At this current time the programs are not in areas where indigenous tribes exist. All farmers in the program are local to the region.

Does the solution consider its impact at least 7-generations into the future (>100 years)?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Not at all
Very little
Somewhat
Very much
Highly integrated

Forest Gardens result in continuously enriched soil, increasing biodiversity and a resilient solution to hunger and poverty for the families who apply the FGA. The solution also makes the land more resilient to climate change. The positive benefits provided by this solution make it resilient against extractive threats. Trees for the Future is true to its name!

What is the risk of unintended negative consequences?

4
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely likely
Very likely
Somewhat likely
Very unlikely
Extremely unlikely

Since applying the FGA in 2014, the only reported unintended consequences have been rare tension between farmers who may not like the presence of a Forest Garden bordering their property. The impact of this is considered extremely low.

It's DDC's opinion that the risk of unintended positive consequences is far higher than the risk of unintended negative consequences.

How significant are the known negative consequences (or trade-offs) of this solution?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely significant
Very significant
Somewhat significant
Not very significant
Not at all significant

When we consider what else could be done with the land, we have not identified any other approach that would be clearly superior for carbon removal. 

The two tradeoffs that we have identified are both minimal:

  • For fertilization and pest control, the FGA uses natural and organic techniques rather than industrial approaches like chemical fertilizer and pesticides.  This is better for people and planet in the long run, but it requires farmers to be masterful — they need to be experts of the technique. If the standards for farmer education and support dropped as the organization scaled, farmers might struggle to control pests and get maximum yields from the farms.

  • Some experts argue for the benefits of massive agriculture, and its ability to feed millions of people at scale as the population grows and the climate becomes increasingly unstable. However, we believe that TFTF's approach will actually allow for that same scale without centralization, if they can replicate fast enough. 

Impact Innovation

95%

How audacious is the "big goal"?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Not at all
Very little
Somewhat
Very much
Extremely

Generating 1,000,000 Forest Gardens in sub-saharan Africa by 2030 would effectively uplift 2 million people from extreme hunger, while providing myriad ecological, economic and social cascading benefits.

How difficult is this challenge to solve (weighing this against how many other organizations have found effective solutions)?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Not difficult at all
Not very difficult
Difficult
Very difficult
Extremely difficult

Alleviating systemic hunger and poverty has proven difficult despite modern civilisation's advances. Scalable and cost-effective solutions to alleviating climate change and the degeneration of soil have also proven equally difficult.

How much has the organization demonstrated an ability to innovate around novel problems?

4
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely non-innovative
Very non-innovative
Somewhat innovative
Very innovative
Extremely innovative

The Forest Garden approach is designed to alleviate the root cause of environmental degradation, poverty, and hunger by applying agroforestry and permaculture techniques.

Trees for the Future's real innovation is how effectively they empower local communities to leverage nature's technology to solve complex challenges.

Click here to see the TFTF planting methodology.

How urgent is this challenge to solve?

5
1
2
3
4
5
Extremely distant
Relatively distant
Relatively urgent
Very urgent
Immediate threat

Trees for the Future's Forest Garden solution directly addresses many of the most pressing global issues of our time. See “top-level issues” identified by the United Nations. Most notably:

- Africa: Poverty, desertification, malnutrition

- Agriculture: Food Security, Sustainable agriculture

- Development: Social transformation, Economic development

- Environment: pollution, deforestation, desertification.

- Food: Missing food security and safety, world hunger.

- Health: Extreme poverty.

- Women: Women's rights, gender equality.

Extreme hunger, extreme poverty and climate change are an immediate threat to the wellbeing of all.

Reference 1

Reference 2

Note this list of what millenials identify as the world's most pressing issues. (1, 3, 4, 7, 9, 10). Click here.

Impact Stack

8.6

SDG01

Trees for the Future's Forest Garden solution has demonstrated a replicable capability of enabling farmers to transition from monocrop farming to biodiverse farming, which increases their income by 400% on average. Furthermore, through the agroforestry methods applied, farmers diversify from single crops to at least 12 varieties, enabling them to take products to market throughout the year (rather than with one annual harvest). This provides further economic resiliency by reducing single points of failure to economic security.

SDG02

Within the first year of applying the Forest Garden solution, farmers see a dramatic dropoff in days of the week without a meal. Within 4 years, farmers will have generated 7.7 tons of organic fruits and vegetables - enough to continuously eliminate extreme hunger, while providing the economic benefits enabled by the overflows of their harvest.

SDG03

By eliminating extreme hunger, families make an exponential leap in health and well-being. Furthermore, the training program enables farmers to choose their own mix of healthy fruits and vegetables to grow.

Additionally, increases of income help farmers get more access to health care.

Click here to open a full analysis of nutritional improvements provided by Forest Gardens.

SDG05

At least 40% program participants are women (often this number is higher, depending on the region), helping to break a long cycle of male dominated economic stability in the region. By enabling women to attain economic independence, overall gender inequalities are reduced.

SDG08

The nearly exponential growth in income and overall economic stability for families applying the Forest Garden approach cannot be over-emphasized. By increasing income by 400% on average, farmers are able to significantly improve overall quality of life with meaningful work. Increased income enables local economic growth, where economically capable families can invest in their local communities, driving upward economic growth regionally.

SDG10

Forest Gardens significantly reduce income inequalities, promote social and economic inclusion, increase overall opportunities, significantly improve livelihoods, independence, resilience, and fulfillment.

SDG12

The Forest Garden Approach allows for farmers to grow and consume from their land, selling excess on the local economy. Everything is sourced locally and grown organically. Farmers also learn to sustainably source water, make and use compost, and use leaf litter as fodder for their animals.

More broadly, as the negative ecological impacts of mass-monocrops on soil health become increasingly clear, the biodiverse nature of Forest Gardens (with a focus on permaculture) empowers an agricultural infrastructure that enriches the land, rather than degrades it.

SDG13

Through the planting of trees, Forest Gardens combat climate change and slow or reverse its symptoms. Not only do trees sequester carbon and restore groundwater tables, they also protect the farmer's land from more intense and unpredictable weather that has resulted from climate change (particularly, Forest Gardens have demonstrated enhanced resiliency to flooding compared to traditional farming methods).

SDG15

Forest Gardens help grow, regenerate and conserve local forests and animal habitats.

Biodiverse farming demonstrably improves overall soil health(revitalizing degraded or desertified land).

When farmers cultivate their own sources for food, fuel, timber and feed for animals, they no longer need to cut from surrounding forests. Forest Gardens also result in improved insect and plant biodiversity as well as improved soil nutrition.

SDG17

The Forest Garden approach improves agricultural, economic and social capacities where it is applied. It also promotes education with farming, entrepreneurship, community-building, life skills, and technological skills over the four year training period.

Expert Vetters

Tom Chi's photo

Tom Chi

Co-founder, Google X

"Trees for the Future is making agroforestry and self-sufficiency accessible to folks that are really on the margins. This is a remarkable effort, and is also going to help us as the environment becomes more destabilized by climate."

Chad Frischmann's photo

Chad Frischmann

CEO & Founder, Regenerative Intelligence; Former Senior Director, Drawdown Solutions

"This solution is about so much more than planting trees — a solution that helps people, the land, and the climate at the same time by helping the world’s poorest people transition to practices that are more sustainable for themselves and the land. It’s a clear win-win."

Tia Kansara, Ph.D. Hon FRIBA's photo

Tia Kansara, Ph.D. Hon FRIBA

Replenish Earth; Advisor to The Economic Times

(Quote not available)

Robert Suarez's photo

Robert Suarez

Fmr Sr. Portfolio Director @ IDEO; fmr Director of Innovation & Design @ Singularity University

"Trees For The Future is creating conditions conducive to life, both people and planet. By being locally attuned and responsive while remaining resource efficient, Forest Gardens adapt to changing conditions enabling farmers to continue to develop and grow out of hunger and poverty. It's a simple and elegant solution to a very complex challenge."

Lauren Fletcher, Ph.D.'s photo

Lauren Fletcher, Ph.D.

Former Engineer @ Lockheed Martin, NASA; Founding Faculty @ Singularity University

(Quote not available)

Magatte Wade's photo

Magatte Wade

Skin is Skin; Poverty, Inc. documentary; Named “Twenty Young Power Women of Africa” by Forbes

(Quote not available)

Individual Questions

The Context

In Sub-Saharan Africa, 422 million people still live below the poverty line, living on less than $700/year. Smallholder farmers produce around 1/3 of the world’s food, but these farmers are often some of the poorest and most food-insecure people in the world. These families that rely on the land to survive are often trapped in cycles of hunger and poverty.

At the same time, around the world, landscapes are deteriorating and ecosystems are collapsing. Unsustainable land use drives many of these problems. Deforestation, soil degradation, and biodiversity loss are all tied to our global food system. In an effort to grow enough food to eat and sell, farmers are encouraged to clear their land of trees and native species. This unsustainable approach is harming people and the planet.  Many farmers practice ‘monocrop’ agriculture — growing only one type of produce, year after year — which depletes the soil and only provides a single crop annually, and is susceptible to total crop failure. 

With the tools to create a forest garden, and 4 years of training, Trees for the Future helps farmers shift away from the destructive patterns of monocrop farming, and dramatically improve their lives. 

About

We’re levelin’ up philanthropy!


The Dollar Donation Club Integrated Impact Score was designed to ensure that the world’s most powerful and holistic solutions are presented to our members. The goal is to identify acupuncture points of change – solutions that create maximum positive benefit using minimal resources, while triggering a large cascade of additional benefits.


More importantly, the Integrated Impact Score embodies our approach of smart-philanthropy.


It’s not enough for us to give with only our heart. We must also give intelligently – identifying solutions that address root causes, generate outsized measurable outcomes, integrate holistically into existing communities, consider long-term impacts, reduce the risk of unintended consequences and lead to self-reliant capabilities rather than co-dependencies.


It’s time for us to focus less on things like “overhead ratios” and more on the total, holistic positive result per dollar. Oh yeah, and it should be fun!


We believe that the best solutions...


  • Solve root-causes rather than symptoms.
  • Consider their impact 100 years into the future.
  • Produce massive impact efficiently.
  • Care for people and planet holistically.
  • Leverage nature’s and humanity’s best technologies.
  • Are radically transparent – financially and operationally.
  • Are resilient against threats of reversal.
  • Result in self-reliance, rather than dependence.
  • Clearly understand total costs to achieve outcomes.

This vetting methodology was designed with careful care to identify these solutions.



How we calculate the Integrated Impact Score:


Individual Dimension Score


The scores for each individual dimension (e.g. Transparency, Measurability) are calculated by adding up the total points (1-5) per section and dividing by the total possible points for that section.


Impact Stack


The amount of points awarded for the Impact Stack section is based on an assessment of how directly or indirectly and effectively or ineffectively the solution addresses a particular Sustainable Development Goal, using the SDG indicators as a guide. Impact Stack is treated like a bonus of points by adding up the total Impact Stack score and dividing by 10 (i.e. every 10 points gives a bonus of +1 to the final IIS score).


Overall Integrated Impact Score


The overall Integrated Impact Score is calculated by averaging the total scores received in each of the Individual Dimensions (e.g. Transparency, Measurability, etc.). We then add the bonus points awarded by the Impact Stack. Overall scores are rounded up to the nearest integer at 0.5 (e.g. if a score of 94.5 is calculated, the final score will be 95, if a score of 94.4 is calculated, the final score will be 94).

Vetting methodology 02.01 | Originally published 09.23.2020, updated 01.05.2023 | This report's change log is here.

footer bgnoise pattern

100% of contributions go to the Dollar Donation Club Fund, a wholly owned subsidiary of Legacy Global Foundation Inc, a public 501(c)3 charitable organization.

Š Dollar Donation Club 2024